joyful wrote:
2. Matthew 5:17-20 (New International Version)
The fulfilment of the law
We see that most Christian communities are washing down the Commandments because it is not cool to follow them. We are so spoiled that it is very hard to keep God's commandments.
Would you advise following the entire book of Deuteronomy, then?
_________________
Socionics - the Analyst!
Viperlord wrote:
joyful wrote:
2. Matthew 5:17-20 (New International Version)
The fulfilment of the law
We see that most Christian communities are washing down the Commandments because it is not cool to follow them. We are so spoiled that it is very hard to keep God's commandments.
Would you advise following the entire book of Deuteronomy, then?
We don't have to, Jesus' sacrifice is suffcient that we don't have to obey ceremonial laws. Jesus' commandments are all in the New Testement.
Back to top
Viperlord
Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Posts: 30
Location: Somewhere beyond here...
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:54 am Post subject:
joyful wrote:
We don't have to, Jesus' sacrifice is suffcient that we don't have to obey ceremonial laws. Jesus' commandments are all in the New Testement.
How do you tell one type of law apart from another?
_________________
Socionics - the Analyst!
Viperlord wrote:
joyful wrote:
We don't have to, Jesus' sacrifice is suffcient that we don't have to obey ceremonial laws. Jesus' commandments are all in the New Testement.
How do you tell one type of law apart from another?
If it is in the New Testament you can follow and if not, don't.
Back to top
Viperlord
Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Posts: 30
Location: Somewhere beyond here...
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:04 am Post subject:
joyful wrote:
There always seems to be ways to attack the truth. The more half-hearted the more skilled in attacks. You will see this especially in the Christian forums. They don't seem to be happy with agree to disagree.
Do you want to agree to disagree? This surprises me.
_________________
Socionics - the Analyst!
Viperlord wrote:
joyful wrote:
There always seems to be ways to attack the truth. The more half-hearted the more skilled in attacks. You will see this especially in the Christian forums. They don't seem to be happy with agree to disagree.
Do you want to agree to disagree? This surprises me.
All I am doing is exposing the evil deeds and most of my oposers fight and argue trying to change my convictions. Convictions are not debatable, do you know what I am saying?
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 Posts: 77 Location: Somewhere beyond here...
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:58 pm Post subject: Re: questions from viperlord
joyful wrote:
All I am doing is exposing the evil deeds and most of my oposers fight and argue trying to change my convictions. Convictions are not debatable, do you know what I am saying?
I understand. It seems strange to me, because my convictions are debatable. _________________ Socionics - the Analyst!
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:33 pm Post subject: Re: questions from viperlord
Viperlord wrote:
joyful wrote:
All I am doing is exposing the evil deeds and most of my oposers fight and argue trying to change my convictions. Convictions are not debatable, do you know what I am saying?
I understand. It seems strange to me, because my convictions are debatable.
Well, I don't trust trinitarians. I am only defending Jesus' teachings and you trinitarians are following your own theologies. You have many of them; it is not only trinty.
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 Posts: 77 Location: Somewhere beyond here...
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:57 pm Post subject: Re: questions from viperlord
joyful wrote:
Well, I don't trust trinitarians. I am only defending Jesus' teachings and you trinitarians are following your own theologies. You have many of them; it is not only trinty.
So it's about trust, is it? I don't usually judge what people say based on whether I trust the person, but if you do, that explains why you dislike complexity.
Evidently you have been listening to someone or something besides the New Testament. I'm guessing it was a Jehovah's Witness, and you no longer trust the person, but you still believe the things he told you in the past. You are believing a bad source. _________________ Socionics - the Analyst!
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:25 am Post subject: Re: questions from viperlord
Viperlord wrote:
So it's about trust, is it? I don't usually judge what people say based on whether I trust the person, but if you do, that explains why you dislike complexity.
I don't trust trinitarians because their obvious hypocrisy as a whole. Why can't you understand this simple logic? You aren't striving to follow Jesus' teachings, or else you would not have such a hard time understanding what I am saying. Or are you just trying to make me dizzy with your rabbit trail discussion?
Quote:
Evidently you have been listening to someone or something besides the New Testament. I'm guessing it was a Jehovah's Witness, and you no longer trust the person, but you still believe the things he told you in the past. You are believing a bad source.
I have been reading the Bible and watching churches hypocritical practices about 35 years.
I tried to join JW one time. Because they don't join the military, I figured they cannot be bad. Their biblical reasonings are just about the same as mine. But they believe they are the only true christians. and they are giving too much power to their elders. Their top few people make all decisions and they dont give any room to have their own walk with Jesus. That's why I did not join them. They have controlling spirit and it is not of God.
They helped me to understand biblical symbolism. I respect their biblical researches. But I don't agree with all of them. their biblical research are much more genuine than trinitarians.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
